Log in

No account? Create an account
entries friends calendar profile Previous Previous Next Next
A little less than a happy high
Yep, needed that
26 comments or Leave a comment
inahandbasket From: inahandbasket Date: May 27th, 2005 05:17 pm (UTC) (Link)
actually I like yours most out of the three.
The pearls looks like a product shot, and the "interpretive piece" just doesn't thrill me.
prosicated From: prosicated Date: May 27th, 2005 05:49 pm (UTC) (Link)
I'm inclined to agree with Ry, P. I really like the piece you posted, not so much in comparison to the other pieces, as they're all really different, but for what the piece provokes in me.

There's something really phenomenal about the temporality of the photos you take -- there's a photographer-protagonist, and a setting and an event in every one you've posted so far -- it's a really unique and appreciable art, and very different than the photos posted before and after you in 7 shots. N
komos From: komos Date: May 27th, 2005 07:18 pm (UTC) (Link)
I feel like the shots I've been taking are too concrete, and that I may be imposing myself upon them too much. I guess I'm hoping to evoke some of what I feel in addtion to communication what I see. Sometimes that may involve the story that I want the image to tell. Sometimes that doesn't go beyond "Neat!" Most of the time I end up falling short of what I'd like to do.

Like I said to D-, it's growing pains. I do appreciate your thoughts though. Thanks.
_meej_ From: _meej_ Date: May 27th, 2005 09:19 pm (UTC) (Link)
See, I've gotta interject here. "Imposing [yourself] too much on them" seems like an odd perspective to have; either you're photographing as photojournalism/documentation, which doesn't seem to be your aim, or you're photographing as an expressive/interpretive art form to convey something about your experience or observations.

Assuming I'm right and it's the latter - that the piece is a piece in itself, and not just a window onto an event - then it seems to me you *can't*, by definition, impose yourself too much on them. It's your experience that defines them, that makes them more than just chemicals recording light on paper.

It's exactly the fact that you're imposing yourself and an interpretive/selective/emotive lens on them that makes them evoke what you feel in addition to simply communicating.

It's working. Keep at it, and don't be afraid to regard it as a medium instead of a result. (Not that you necessarily are, but...)
komos From: komos Date: May 31st, 2005 03:17 pm (UTC) (Link)
One of the things I've found is that it's nigh on impossible to hide behind a camera. Merely by pointing the instrument in a direction, you become a participant, an actor. You may still be separate from that thing you've focused on, but the act transforms you into something other than a mere spectator.

All this is very intimidating for me, if only because I've spent the majority of my life attempting invisibility. At this point, I could go into the idea of the photograph as a therapeutic tool, but that might just get weird. Suffice to say that being behind the lens makes me feel exposed, and that that feeling makes me feel like I'm too much with the resulting images.
komos From: komos Date: May 27th, 2005 06:34 pm (UTC) (Link)
I really like the colors in both, and the movement in the latter. I wasn't entirely happy with mine. I didn't get the shot I wanted, and I didn't have time to go back because I was already running late for the office.

I'm mostly just being grumpy today. Thanks for saying.
inahandbasket From: inahandbasket Date: May 27th, 2005 06:40 pm (UTC) (Link)
grump away captain grumpmeister!

I'm never one to deny another some grumpage. Just don't insult your picture. ^_^
komos From: komos Date: May 27th, 2005 06:43 pm (UTC) (Link)
I think I need a wookie icon. I heart wookie icons.
26 comments or Leave a comment